🔗 Share this article

Itranspired he could survive a loss to Grimsby. He weathered an important European final versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, undermining the team's most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to tango. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight defender in Blackburn’s championship campaign, Amorim took on the executive and seems to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a coach who often railed his squad for failing in individual battles succumbing when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this entire bruising episode seems to paint the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless a previous executive before him, he has proved himself as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that the club's mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

A Tactical Clash Over Formation & Ideology

For example, it was the director , after having been part of the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties faced pushback. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when delivered from the mouth of a man the impeccable soccer background he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to outline his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, without any penalty clause activated. The director speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite equivalent to being prepared to receive.

An Ultimate Power Behind Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the true genius behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has made very clear his preference for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to adopt data science and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he announced that the team's approach to football “shall be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Whom else would you trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a modern arena that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Order: Directors Above Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to go into an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have such individuals established? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the strategy in the boardroom and hire a coach who will adapt their offering to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the product, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined while the people who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

A Neoliberal Football: Accountability for the Few

And possibly in a small way this represents corporate governance at work: the elevation of a gilded elite who are infallible, whose choices are always untouchable, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss him for playing excessively 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and later discard him for taking too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.